Solar urban design using Energy3D: Part III
Wednesday, May 22nd, 2013 by Charles Xie
In Part I and II, we discussed how solar simulations in Energy3D can be used to decide where to erect a new building in a city block surrounded by existing buildings. Now, what about putting multiple buildings in the block? The optimization problem becomes more complex because students will have to deal with more variables while searching for an optimal solution.Suppose students have to decide the locations of two new constructions A and B such as the ones shown in the first image of this blog post. The horizontal solar radiation heat map shows that the southeast part is a cold area that should be avoided. Now they have six options to layout the new constructions. Namely, they can either place A or place B in the northwest, northeast, and southwest parts. The second image in this blog post shows the results calculated from the solar simulations. Placing the buildings in the northeast and northwest parts (row 1 in the image) seems to be the optimal solution and we can either put A or B in each of the areas and vice versa -- the sum of the solar energy they will receive doesn't seem to change much. This is not surprising because this layout creates large south-facing areas that will get a lot of solar energy in the winter.
What is a little surprising to me is that the last set of layout, i.e. the layout of A (or B) in southwest and B (or A) in northeast (row 3 in the image) produces less solar heating than the layout of A (or B) in southwest and B (or A) in northwest (row 2 in the image). This is counter-intuitive because in the latter configuration the south-facing area seems to be less. Without the solar simulator to give me the exact numbers, I would have predicted the wrong thing using the simple-minded south-facing rule.
Links:

















